Home


Products / English


English

Français Italiano Español Português Català Maltin

Deutsch Nederlands Lëtzebuergesch Gaeilge Scottish Dansk Svenska Norsk Íslensku Suomalainen Eestlane Latvietis Lietuvis

Pусский Беларус українська Polski Česky Slovenský Magyar Română Slovenščina Hrvatski Bosanski Српски Shqiptar български македонски Ελληνικά ქართული Türk हिन्दी

عربى

中国 日本語 한국어



Contents / English

(More than 500 articles about tongkat ali and better physical relationships in general)



Wrong priorities you have, if they are anything other than optimal relationships - part 3

By Serge Kreutz

Human life and mating strategies, 2019

With most of my articles, I have addressed a primarily male audience. Even though I have started to edit my work to address more of a female audience, too, the tilt remains. Thus, while in the further paragraphs of this article, males are the addressed audience, many of the assessments also apply to women.

Western men who are in mid-life and depressed usually started out with the wrong priorities. Their priority for many years has been to advance their professional careers, or to run a business and to accumulate wealth. And because all of this requires a high level of social conformity, they have maneuvered their private lives into a cage, albeit a golden one. When you pursue a political career, you can't have parallel relationships relatiinships, or be a bigamist. You can't even visit a prostitute, or watch pornography.

So you ask: and what about Mr. Bill Clinton? A womanizer. I have to laugh. A marriage, and a few affairs left and right (probably all publicly known). Are these all his exploits? I match his lifetime achievements within a few weeks.

Social climbing? The only currency in which we can realistically measure male success is the quantity and quality of relationships relationships, and the satisfaction we get out of them.

The dialectical nature of human biology (and sexuality) brings with it that traditionally, female success is measured with a different stick: her ability to bind an alpha male, and if it can't be an alpha, a beta version will do. However, for truly liberated women, not her capability to bind a male, but the degree to which she achieves optimal relationships experience is what determines her individual success.

Eastern societies, throughout history, have always been more sensible in that a successful man could have as many women, wives, or concubines as he could afford), while in Western (basically European) society, there has, for some 1500 years (of Christianity) always been a clear imperative for monogamous relationships.

And that's the model that sets modern moral standards.

In such a world, men have to make awkward choices. Social climbing, on certain routes, results in fewer, not in more rewards. Just look at the politicians of the Western, democratic world. Who, in his right mind, wants to be the president of a Western European country? Or a television personality? Or, for that matter, in any position which is subject to constant public scrutiny?

My biological parameters, philosophically emphasized, are that I strive to have optimal relationships experience with a considerable number of different partners. For the self-conscious individual of our species, all metaphysical projections beyond one's lifetime don't mean much if they are in conflict with the only thing that really counts: relationships satisfaction (an after that, a gentle death).

If, in the modern Western world, you place the need for optimal relationships experience behind your career, and behind your business, and behind accumulating riches, you stand a good chance to miss out on what really matters.

To be rich, of course, can come in handy. If you know how to exchange riches into relationships satisfaction. And no, I don't mean frequenting nightlife establishments. They'll exchange your riches alright, but not for a satisfying love life. What you'll get from them is just some outrageously overpriced champagne (or orange juice), and relationships that possibly is worse than masturbation.

I have been totally focused all my life on successful mating, and I am aware of the fact that my love life is better than what 99 percent of all men experience. I don't frequent prostitutes, but for many years have had at least one new relationships affair each month.

In my younger years, I primarily had to concern myself with supply questions. What to do to have at least one new relationships relationship per month, or fortnight. I have solved this problem when I moved to Asia, and I believe that many men, whether young or advanced in age, could learn from my experience.

I am now well beyond 60, and over the past decade, I have increasingly faced restrictions to my love life that had nothing to do with supply problems, but with nature throwing handicaps at me.

There is no question that at my age, one's physical and mental ability to experience full relationships satisfaction tends to decline. This has never been acceptable to me, and throughout years of experimenting, I have found ways to counteract this tendency. I can proudly announce that my physical capabilities of lovemaking are as good, or better, than they were 20 or 30 years ago.

I am also proud that my capability to satisfy my partners now is better than it ever was. Some of my girlfriends have carried on with me simply because they are much more likely to achieve an orgasm with me than with anybody else.


Read more about wrong and right priorities in life

or

Read a tell-it-all about Indonesian 1:200 tongkat ali extract (and a psychopath on the prowl for killings)





References:

Barash, D. (2017) Revolutionary Biology The New, Gene-centered View of Life Routledge, New York

Bar-Yam, Y., Sayama, H. Formalizing the Gene Centered View of Evolution. Unifying Themes in Complex Systems Pages: 215-222

Brake, E. (2011) Minimizing Marriage: Marriage, Morality, and the Law. Oxford University Press

Dash, A.T., Cressman, R. (1988) Polygamy in human and animal species. Mathematical Biosciences Volume 88, Issue 1, Pages: 49-66

Devlin, R., Devlin, B. (1965) The enforcement of morals. Oxford University Press

Evans, H. (1992) Monogamy and female sexuality in the People's Republic of China books.google.com

Rehman, W. (2007) The Sharia, Islamic Family Laws and International Human Rights Law: Examining the Theory and Practice of Polygamy and Talaq. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages: 108–127

Wasike, A.N. (2005) Polygamy: A feminist critique. The Will to Arise: Women, Tradition, and the Church in Africa. books.google.com

Wilkinson, E. (2010) What’s queer about non-monogamy now? academia.edu



PT Sumatra Pasak Bumi
7th floor, Forum Nine
Jl. Imam Bonjol No.9
Petisah Tengah
Medan Petisah
Medan City
North Sumatra 20236
Indonesia
Tel: +62-813 800 800 20


Disclaimer: Statements on this page have not undergone the FDA approval process.


Privacy policy of Tongkatali.org

We respect the privacy of customers and people visiting our website. Our site is run from a secure socket layer. We do not use cookies. We do not maintain customer accounts for logging in later. Our website is simple html programming; we don't use WordPress templates or e-commerce plug-ins. We don't do a newsletter to which customers could subscribe, and we don't include standard social media buttons that would link visitors of our site to certain Facebook or Twitter profiles. If privacy is your concern, you are in good hands with us.